Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 08:05

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What is it like to be a Christian in Iran?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why climbing the stairs can be good for your body and brain - BBC
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Megyn Kelly: Meghan Markle's Pregnancy Post Disrespects Childbirth - TheWrap
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Do you regret being married to your current wife?
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
963 RSP Revealed: Meet Porsche's Street-Legal Le Mans Hypercar - Motor1.com
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
9 Things Women’s Health Doctors Would Never Do - HuffPost
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.